当社はお客様の当サイトの利用状況を把握し、お客様の利便性を向上させるためにクッキーを使用しています。これには、コンテンツや広告のパーソナライズも含まれます。当サイトを継続して使用することにより、当社によるCookieの使用、プライバシーポリシー、および利用規約に同意したことになります。 Cookies, Privacy Policy Term of use.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
218 views • September 4, 2023

[PREVIEW] Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg: 10 Types of Misinformation in Peer-Reviewed COVID-19 Paper Decrying Misinformation

Recently, one of America’s leading medical journals, the Journal of the American Medical Association, published a peer-reviewed paper studying the propagation of “COVID-19 misinformation on social media by physicians in the US.” The article is riddled with major errors, labels true information as misinformation, and “exemplifies how relying on the government to decide what's true versus false can be so problematic and can cost lives,” argues Dr. Tracy Beth Høeg, a physician epidemiologist. She works in private practice and also has a position at the department of biostatistics and epidemiology at the University of California–San Francisco. “It's very disturbing that [this paper] passed through the peer review process and was published,” Dr. Høeg says. In this episode of “ATL:NOW,” she breaks down 10 key errors in the piece.
Show All
Comment 0