We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of Cookies, Privacy Policy Term of use.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
238 views • August 18, 2022

Judge Might Release Release Part of Search Affidavit

Capitol Report
Capitol Report
A U.S. judge on Aug. 18 ordered government officials to give him a redacted version of a key document that led to the approval of the search warrant FBI agents executed on former President Donald Trump's home in Florida. U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart will review the proposed redactions and decide if they are appropriate. Reinhart heard from government lawyers, which oppose the release of the version of the affidavit, and attorneys representing media outlets, which are calling for the release of the document, during a hearing in federal court on Aug. 18. Reinhart said during the hearing that there may be information in the affidavit that is so sensitive that he will decide it should remain hidden from the public. Affidavits are sworn statements commonly filed in court cases. In this case, the affidavit outlined reasons why Reinhart should approve a search warrant. Reinhart, who recently recused himself from a case involving Trump's lawsuit against Hillary Clinton, approved the warrant on Aug. 5. He also approved the unsealing of the warrant and some related documents, after the government and Trump's team aligned on supporting the release. Those documents showed that government officials believe Trump violated several laws, including one that prohibits destroying, altering, or falsifying certain records. An inventory showed FBI agents seized classified records from Trump's resort, which is in Palm Beach, but Trump has said that he had declassified the records and asked the government for all of them back. Agents did not list taking passports, but apparently left with three, only to return them soon after Trump requested them back. Investigation in 'Opening Stages' Jay Bratt, representing the government, offered the argument laid out in the government's brief, which said that releasing the affidavit could undermine the investigation at hand, which was said to involve national security matters. “In light of the heightened interest in this matter we took the unusual and really unprecedented step of seeking to unseal the warrant," he said. "There is another public interest; that criminal investigations are capable of going forward. Releasing a search warrant affidavit in the middle of an ongoing investigation is a compelling interest." The investigation in question is in its "opening stages," according to Bratt. Reinhart mused that he is in "a bit of a catch 22" because to support the affidavit not being unsealed, there has to be discussion of information it contains. "There are things that you know and I know that the media don't know," Reinhart said, adding that he can consider the nonpublic information. Bratt outlined concerns that disclosing the affidavit could assist "amateur sleuths on the Internet" in figuring out the identities of FBI agents involved in the case, noting that agents have received threats. That could "chill other witnesses," Bratt said, and imperil their safety. The government lawyer also said that so much information in the document needs redacted that it would leave "very little—nothing of substance." “What’s the harm to the government if I redacted everything but the first word on the first page?” Reinhart asked. That would only serve to burden the government, and would not serve the media, Bratt replied. Reinhart said he was thinking of sections at the beginning of the warrant that could be unsealed, but Bratt said those would not "edify the public in any meaningful way." Media Lawyer Chuck Tobin, representing the media, said that the government is wrongly opposing the release of even a redacted version of the affidavit. The public interest is "powerful" and "unprecedented" in light of the raid of a former president, Tobin said. “The raid on Mar-a-Lago by the FBI is one of the most significant law enforcement events in the nation’s history," Tobin said. Even if it's difficult for the government to go through the affidavit and redact it, that's the government's job, he added, acknowledging that there is likely going to be information that the government is able to justify
Show All
Comment 0